flint.arb/flint.acb Candidate-Mechanism Screen Across WEIL-FLOOR, KERNEL-API, and NB-GAIN (cofinal-candidate-mechanisms-screen-2026-10-16-v1, Repaired per Review)Wall check: Same open gap. Closest results: WEIL-FLOOR, NS24/39/43, NB-GAIN (NS53/61/83/87/98), and ZERO-GEOMETRY (NS100/101). We still need a bound that remains valid as the window grows ($b \to \infty$ or $N \to \infty$), retaining every signed arithmetic contribution and coupling. RH, G2, and both missing-original evidence groups in evidence/MISSING.md remain OPEN. M17 v2 remains PAUSED.
This bounded candidate-testing package (audits/cofinal-candidate-mechanisms-screen-2026-10-16-v1/) executes a deterministic, two-precision (256-bit and 384-bit flint.arb / flint.acb, zero numpy/scipy/mpmath imports) quantitative screen of the six post-v18 candidate mechanisms cataloged in the two pre-computation 5-item arithmetic assessments:
audits/nb-full-residual-arithmetic-assessment-2026-10-16-v1.html (Candidates A, B, C for NB-GAIN)audits/weil-floor-cofinal-arithmetic-assessment-2026-10-16-v1.html (Candidates I, II/IIb, III for WEIL-FLOOR and KERNEL-API)In addition to screening the six candidates, this package establishes and certifies two exact analytic identities in WEIL-FLOOR:
eq:v150-mellin (evidence/v150/capacity_weight.tex) at $z = 1$ that the odd position-weighted Gaussian radical $f_{\mathrm{pos}}(x) = x\,h(x)$ has a strictly positive closed-form odd pole moment $\int_{\mathbb{R}} x\sinh(x/2)h(x)\,dx = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\bigl(1 + \frac{\gamma_E - \log(4\pi)}{2}\bigr) = +0.01333431378871523222883\dots > 0$ and couples to simple critical-line zeros via $\widehat{f_{\mathrm{pos}}}(\gamma_k) = +\frac{2i}{\sqrt{3}}\Xi’(\gamma_k) \ne 0$, while recording its compressed 8-mode Legendre residual on $V_8^{\mathrm{odd}}(-a,a)$ across $\lambda \in {2, 3, 5, 8}$.| Item | Requirement | Implementation in verify_cofinal_candidate_mechanisms.py |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Exact expression | Full unpreconditioned Weil compression $\mathsf{W}\lambda^{(8)} = P_8\bigl(A{\mathrm{arch}}^{\mathrm{full}}(a) + T_{\mathrm{pole}}(a) - T_{\mathrm{arith}}(a)\bigr)P_8$ on $V_8^{\mathrm{even}/\mathrm{odd}}(-a,a)$ (WEIL-FLOOR), and in NB-GAIN: old-space squared error $E_N^{(2)} = 2 - b_{\mathrm{old}}^\top G_N^{-1} b_{\mathrm{old}}$, corrected new-block load $h_N = b_{\mathrm{new}} - C_N^\top G_N^{-1} b_{\mathrm{old}}$, Schur complement $H_N = D_N - C_N^\top G_N^{-1} C_N$, and dyadic step gain $\Delta_N = E_N^{(2)} - E_{2N}^{(2)} = h_N^\top H_N^{-1} h_N$. |
Exact flint.arb matrices for $\lambda \in {2, 3, 5, 8}$ (up to 26 prime-power shifts, $k \le 61$) and $N \in {4, 8, 16, 32}$ via Kernel from evidence/v159/ns61/certify_smoothed.py. |
||
| 2. Coefficient hypotheses | Exact $\Lambda(k)/\sqrt{k}$ weights (WEIL-FLOOR), NS57 perturbation $\delta_2 = -\frac{\log 2}{100}$ (KERNEL-API), and true vs. NS74-perturbed Beurling loads $\beta \in {1/2, 1/2 + 10^{-2}}$ (NB-GAIN). |
All signed coefficients retained; zero positive-weight or diagonal-only surrogates. | ||
| 3. Uniform range | Fixed benchmark windows $\lambda \in {2, 3, 5, 8}$ ($a = \log\lambda$) and finite dyadic prefix dimensions $N \in {4, 8, 16, 32}$. | Exact two-precision (256-bit and 384-bit) ball certificates with 176/176 string-reconstructed .overlaps() checks. |
||
| 4. Estimating method | Exact Stieltjes / Legendre polynomial integration (int_u_poly_exp), ball Cholesky (cholesky_lower_arb) including Weyl perturbation enclosures $(2 |
\delta_2 | )I_8 \pm B_{\delta_2} \succ 0$, arb_mat.solve(..., algorithm="precond"), automatic differentiation (acb_series), and explicit lem:v150-weight tail enclosures for $n \ge 12$ and $x \ge 3.5$. |
Zero floating-point tolerances or midpoint eigenvalue assertions (.contains(0) and > arb(0) only). |
| 5. Remaining transfer & scope | Does the tested mechanism yield a window-independent lower bound $q_a[f] \ge -C_*|f|_2^2$ as $a \to \infty$ or cofinal decrease $E_N^{(2)} \to 0$ as $N \to \infty$? | Disclosed honestly as OPEN: compressed 8-mode residuals and finite-shell ($V_{[4,8]}^{\mathrm{even}}$) ratios do not enclose $V_8(-a,a)^\perp$, four finite sizes $N \in {4, 8, 16, 32}$ cannot establish convergence or persistent gain, and the $a \to \infty$ / $N \to \infty$ signed arithmetic transfers remain open. |
NS research row in NEXT_STEPS.md, a new theorem node in PROOF_GRAPH.md, or a manuscript version bump.M17 v2 (audits/Weil-Floor-Preconditioned-Archimedean-2026-10-15-v2/) or any paused lane (WEIL-FLOOR, KERNEL-API, NB-GAIN).RH, G2, and both historical missing-original evidence groups in evidence/MISSING.md explicitly OPEN.